The People Of Dune By Robert O Reilly - 1923 Words

The people of Dune are lead by the hope that someone stronger than them will take on their challenges. The planet has begun its ecological transformation when it comes into the possession of Duke Leto Atreides. Paul Atreides, the son of the Duke, will become the leader of the Fremen. â€Å"The story tells of the Lisan al-Gaib, ‘the voice from the outer world,’ which will share the dreams of the Fremen and lead them to fulfillment† (O’Reilly). There is a legend among the Fremen that a savior will ensure the success of the transformation. It becomes a rumor that Paul is that messiah because he intuitively knows how to perform Fremen tasks, such as properly wearing a stillsuit. Then, Paul s mother makes it known that the Atreides will support the transformation, adding to the belief that Paul is their messiah. â€Å"Their strong, unconscious projection makes him even more special than he is† (O Reilly). Indeed, the Fremen want to believe that there is someone who can help them, someone who is capable of doing what they are unable to accomplish. â€Å"It was a story about [...] an outsider who went native and used religious fervor to fuel his own ambitions--in this case, to transform the ecology of the planet† (O Reilly). Then, Paul joins the Fremen in the desert, which intensifies the Fremen belief in him. Paul is an important figure for the Fremen, but not only the them. He is also essential to the sisterhood of the Bene Gesserit. The Bene Gesserit is made up of Reverend Mothers who have

American Revolution Notes Radical or Moderate free essay sample

Some historians argue that the Revolution was solely aimed at achieving the Limited goal of independence from Britain. There was a consensus among the Americans about keeping things as they were once the break from Britain had been accomplished The Revolution was inevitably viewed as a struggle of liberty versus tyranny between America and Britain. The Revolution was radical in its character, according to Bancroft, because it hastened the advance of human beings toward a millennium of everlasting peace and universal brotherhood.The imperial school believed that political and constitutional issues brought on the Revolution. The Progressive historians held that the primary causes were social and economic. Gibson claimed the British were Justified In taxing the Americas and tightening the Navigation Acts after 1763, because largely Brutish blood and money had been expended In the Great War for Empire, 1754-1763 (French and Indian War). Carl L. Becker, Charles A. Beard, Arthur M. Schlesinger Sir. , and J. Franklin Jameson stressed class conflict as well as insisted the political or constitutional ideas had an underlying economic basis.Disenchantment of the merchants with British rule, said Schlesinger, arose from the economic reverses they suffered as a result of the strict policy of imperial control enacted by the mother country after the French and Indian War. The merchant class later became, in Schlesinger words, a potent factor o the conservative counterrevolution that led to the establishment of the United States Constitution. In the struggle between colonies and the mother country, the Americans emerged as the conservatives because they were trying to keep matters as they were before 1763.Daniel J. Verboten argued that the revolution was conservative on the Imperial as well as the local level because Americans were fighting to retain traditional rights and liberties granted to them under the Brutish constitution. In refusing to accept the principle of no taxation without repre sentation, Abortionist wrote, the patriots were insisting upon an old liberty, not a new right. The colonists, according to Bailey, were convinced that there was a sinister plot against liberty in both England and America.Americans believed the conspiracy had succeeded in England and that America represented the last bastion or the defense f English liberties and the freedom of all mankind. Bailey took issue with the Progressive historians who declared that the patriot leaders were indulging in mere rhetoric when they employed such words as conspiracy, corruption, and slavery. The colonists meant what they said; the fear of conspiracy against constitutional authority was built Into the very structure of politics, and these words represented real fears, real anxieties, [and] a sense of real danger. Nash concluded that social changes had turned these seaport communities Into crucibles of revolutionary agitation. The increasing poverty and the narrowing of economic opportunities resulted in Some [New Left Historians] pictured the Revolution as a social movement an internal strug gle within the colonies caused in part by class antagonism. Grooms conclusion was conservative that the townspeople had gone to war not to promise social change, but to stop it. Some of the new social historians suggested the Americans may have been caught up in a serious identity crisis as a people on the eve of the Revolution. Such historians saw Americans as profoundly conflicted toward the mother country. To Shy, the war was not an instrument of policy or a sequence of military operations solely, but rather a social process of education. The Radicalism of the American Revolution, by Gordon Wood, suggests that the Revolution ushered in a new American no longer hampered by habits of deference, feelings of inferiority, or hesitation about economic advancement.Wood, like Bailey before him, insisted on the Revolutions radical transformation of ideas of property, work, and the self. Property no longer meant simply land; it also meant personal wealth dynamic, fluid, an evanescent.. . Which, claimed, unlike land could not create personal authority or identity. Work, not leisure, suddenly defined Americans, and most important, the Revolution gave Americans a sense of equality and self-worth. This repudiation explains the predetermined nature of the outraged response to Great Britains provocative policies in the years before the Revolution.They [Americans] felt the sting not only of extra taxes and burdens of maintaining the British military presence, but also the humiliation of rejection from participation in an Englishmen they believed they shared. While Barrens revision returned to an earlier view of the ideological origins of the Revolution, nevertheless he agreed with Bailey, Wood, and, in a modulated way, Bancroft, that the Revolution had, in the long run, radical results. R. R.Palmer compared the intellectual and ideological trajectories from the American and French revolutions, finding more political consensus and continuity in the United States despite greater levels of inequality. In France, on the other hand, he contended that there had been less stability and more open conflict over class than in the United States. T. H. Breed Four new elements in particular influenced how the colonists imagined themselves within the Anglo-American world: the developing military strength of Great Britain, the spread of a consumer-oriented economy, the creation of a self-conscious middle- sense of British national identity.Franklin announced that Americans must know, must think, and must care, about the country the chiefly trade with. Ordinary people laboring men and women as well as members of a self-confident middling group who bellowed out the words to the newly composed Rule Britannic and who espoused positively to the emotional appeal of God Save the King gave voice to the common aspirations of a militantly Protestant culture. P. J. Marshall remarks, British nationalism had an extremely adverse impact on men and women who did not happen to live at home. According to Marshall, English people could perhaps envisage a common community with the Welsh and, often with much difficult, with the Scots, but they failed to incorporate the Irish or colonial Americans into their idea of nation. At indictment, therefore, colonial Americans confronted what must have mimed a radically new British consciousness. It was this fluid, unstable context that colonist on the periphery attempted to construct their own imagined identity within the empire. Confronted with a sudden intensification of British nationalism, the colonists initial impulse was to Join the chorus, protesting their true Brutishness, their unquestioned loyalty to king and constitution, and their deep antipathy for France and Catholicism. We must pay close attention here to chronology, to the different phases in a developing conversation with England as the colonist moved room accommodation to resistance, from claims of Brutishness to independence.European settlers of an earlier period had, of course, struggled with some of the same issues, alternately celebrating and lamenting the development of cultural differences. But whatever the roots of the challenge, dramatic changes in English society, several of which we have already examined, forced provincial Americans for the first time to confront the full meaning of Brutishness in their lives. Like Franklin, Bellman assumed that England and America were equals. The success of one directly undistributed to the succe ss of the other.Both found fulfillment in their common Brutishness. According to Bellman, the brilliant leadership of William Pit during the Seven Years War had attached us more firmly than ever, to the kingdom of Britain. We are proud of our connection with a nation whose flag was triumphant in every corner of the Globe. We were fond of repeating every plaudit, which the ardent affection of the British nation bestowed on a young monarch [George Ill], rising to glory in the name of Briton. As became increasingly and distressingly obvious ruing the run-up to independence, heightened British nationalism was actually English nationalism writ large. Plough]egger [John Adams] stated that the source of anger was not so much parliamentary taxation without representation as it was the sudden realization the that British really regarded the white colonial Americans as second class beings, indeed as persons so inferior from the metropolitan perspective that they somehow deserved a lesser measure of freedom.The Reverend Samuel Sherwood of Connecticut protested that colonists were not an inferior species of animals, made the beast of burden to a lawless, corrupt administration. Lee remarked with obvious resentment, despite superior family background, the Virginians of his own generation are treated, not as the fellow-subjects but as the servants of Britain. Adams concluded that it was the English who had projected a sense of difference and inferiority upon the colonists. American as a descriptive a term in some measure intended to be humiliating and debasing. Richard L. Merritt discovered that available evidence indicates that Englis hmen began to identify the colonial population as American persistently after 1763 a decade before Americans did so. P. J. Marshall again reminded us that the rise of the concept of American owed quite a lot to British usage. The Stamp Act crisis came after an intense burst of Imperial royalty during the Seven Years War, and the colonists felt badly betrayed.Bailey concluded that when Parliament attempted to tax the colonists without representation, Americans assumed the worst. Events appeared to be fulfilling their ideological nightmares. And in this situation, they employed a strident country language employed originally be English politicians, critical of court corruption, to translate imperial regulatory policy into a dangerous plot against provincial liberty and property. The extraordinary bitterness and acrimony of colonial rhetoric requires us to consider the popular fear that the English were systematically regulating Americans to second-class standing within the empire. What we tend to forget, however, is that they also complained that their British Brothers had begun treating them like Negroes, a charge that cannot be sails explained as an American echo of English political possession.Within the radically evolving imperial framework, the Stamp Act seemed and especially poignant for the Americans of their new second-class status. According to Cunnings, it was far from our intentions inclination to separate ourselves from Great-Britain; and that we had it not even in contemplation to set up for independence; but on the contrary, earnestly wished to remain connected with her, until she deprived s of all hopes of preventing such a connection, upon any better terms and unconditional submission. Gary B. Nash

The Vision Essay Research Paper Most people free essay sample

The Vision Essay, Research Paper Most people are disbelieving about psychics and psychic powers. In the book The Vision by Dean Koontz, there arises a existent convincing psychic Mary, who has visions of slayings that are yet to go on. But, a new turn to the narrative causes Mary to see a different sort of vision. Murders more ghastly than of all time. More hard to see. Harder to prosecute. All these factors cause the reader, and perchance Mary to inquire who are the 1s who truly care for her. Can the liquidator perchance be person she loves? Or possibly a haunting truth about the yesteryear. The narrative takes topographic point in assorted locations of modern twenty-four hours California. Some of the narrative takes topographic point in Los Angeles, but the most momentous portion of the narrative takes topographic point in a small town called King # 8217 ; s Point. The town is on the Pacific Coast Highway, and expensive houses dot the shoreline. Refering to the visions, Dean Koontz vividly describes the scene of each of them, as they take topographic point. For illustration, he takes the reader to one of the scenes of a slaying. A little beauty store in Santa Ana, California. He forces the reader to visualize the assorted facets of a normal beauty store, such as, the outside. The neon visible radiations, the thenar trees, the jade-plant hedges, and the money-scented air. He informs the reader of the aroma of the shampoo, pick rinse, Cologne, and sweat. He tells how the floor was covered in hair, and the violet colour of the walls, and the plush purple rug. He describes the sound of the hair drier and the gunfire in which the liquidator shot the teller. As one can see, the writer exhaustively describes the scene. The chief character is of class, the psychic, Mary Bergen. She is the writer of a syndicated newspaper column about psychic phenomena, and the 1 who pursues the visions in which the liquidator creates. The true individuality of the liquidator is non clear until the terminal of the book. Max Bergen, Mary # 8217 ; s hubby, and Alan Tanner, Mary # 8217 ; s brother, each attempt to assist Mary prosecute her visions to catch the slayer, and to liberate Mary # 8217 ; s life of the atrocious emphasis that encompasses her. But Max and Alan don # 8217 ; t acquire along really good. Alan feels that Mary could hold picked a better adult male to get married, because he believes that all Max is after is Mary # 8217 ; s money, and that Max doesn # 8217 ; t truly recognize how delicate she is. Max knows how Alan feels, but evidently he disagrees. Max is reasonably a strong adult male, six inches taller, and forty lbs heavier than Alan. Although Max had promised Mary that he would neer physica lly fight another individual, he feels a strong demand to contend Alan, but knows that won # 8217 ; t halt him from being so chesty. Alan on the other manus, can easy carry people with his sweet voice, and delighting visual aspect. There is besides Dr. Cauvel, Mary # 8217 ; s head-shrinker, and Lou Pasternak, one of Mary # 8217 ; s old friends. Calcium uvel urgently tries to associate Mary’s visions to the yesteryear. Pasternak, an alcoholic journalist, helps Mary and Max seek to happen the slayer, and halt him. Mary Bergen, the well-known psychic, has unfortunate visions of liquidators killing their victims. One twenty-four hours, a awful vision appears with no warning. And from so on, these visions are even more ghastly than her usual visions, and they ever prevent Mary from seeing the slayer # 8217 ; s face. This puzzles Mary, so she goes to her head-shrinker Dr. Cauvel, to seek some replies. He tries to dig into her yesteryear and unveil some truths. She was abused as a kid by one of her neighbours, who purportedly killed all of her brother Alan # 8217 ; s pets. And her male parent died when she was truly immature. Mary doesn # 8217 ; t clearly recall any of the maltreatment she experienced. All she can truly retrieve is the flutter of a batch of wings, like those of a bird. She frequently has visions of merely the wings, and it is an mystery which badly frightens Mary. All she knows, is the wings relate to her maltreatment. Sing that Mary has blocked this portion of her yesteryear ou t, Cauvel believes that her maltreatment is what caused her to get down holding these visions. That same twenty-four hours, a vision comes to her. As she tries to prosecute the vision and see the slayers face, 100s of glass Canis familiariss that the Doctor had collected, flew of the shelves, and at Mary. Scared and confused, Mary subsequently looks for comfort in Max. He of class amenitiess her, and attempts to assist work out the enigma. He takes her to King # 8217 ; s Point where the following slaying is to take topographic point and to run into with Lou, who helps them by holding a sitting to reply some of Mary # 8217 ; s inquiries. A Ouji board assists in replying these inquiries. But, there are a few inquiries asked by the reader, such as: Is the slayer really person who is near to Mary? The Vision by Dean Koontz, is a really exciting book that will most decidedly maintain one turning the pages. It has a batch of suspense, and most of all, a batch of enigma. The writer does a good occupation in allowing the reader cognize what is traveling on at all times. He does so in such an interesting mode, which keeps one beggary for more. The book itself has a really attractive screen which besides gets one # 8217 ; s attending. This book is recommended to about anyone, but largely to those who like slaying enigmas. In reading this book, one will happen that the chief character Mary, goes through many hazards but neer seems to give up. She persists with her visions until she feels that justness has been served. Even though she has some people against her, chiefly the sceptics, she besides has people who love her assisting. This merely shows that even though one might experience like the universe is against them, they really have friends who love them plenty to assist them work out all their jobs. It merely takes continuity and forbearance. 31a

Ceremonial Speech by L. B. Johnson an Example of the Topic History Essays by

Ceremonial Speech by L. B. Johnson 'I speak tonight for the dignity of men and the destiny of democracy. I urge every member of both parties, Americans of all religions and of all colors, from every sections of this country, to join me in that cause.' Ladies and gentlemen, these are words spoken by our president Lyndon B. Johnson in his quest to make America a nation free of discrimination by race and color of the skin. He went on ahead to say 'there is no cause for self satisfaction in the denial of equal rights of millions of Americans, but there is cause for hope and for faith in our democracyfor the cries of pain, the hymns and protests of oppressed people have summoned into convocation all the majesty of this great government. Our mission is at once the oldest and most basic of this country: to right wrong, do justice to serve man. In our time, we have come to live with moments of great crisis. Our lives have been marked with debate about great issues of war and peace, issues of prosperity and depression. But rar ely in any time does an issue lay bare the secret heart of America itself.' The issue he was referring to was that of equal rights for all Americans regardless of ethnicity, color or race. Need essay sample on "Ceremonial Speech by L. B. Johnson" topic? We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you Proceed Undergraduates Usually Tell Us: Is EssayLab the cheapest essay writing service which can help with my paper? Essay writer professionals suggest: Academic Writers are waiting for your order Lyndon B Johnson was the then president of the United States of America having just being elected after the assassination of J. F. Kennedy. He had called on Americans to eliminate from the nation all and any traces of prejudice against other fellow Americans. In doing so, he adopted the slogan as used by black Americans civil rights activists at the time. In his speech, addressed to congress, he urged them to realize the fact that all men were created equally and that should apply to their rights in this case, the right to vote. He went ahead to appeal to them by saying that the right to vote was rooted in democracy with no excuse, delay, hesitation or compromise for denial of the right irrespective of color or race of an individual. He called on congress to overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice that plagued the nation. This he delivered in front of a joint session of congress Lyndon B. Johnson was one of the greatest presidents of our country. As the 36th president, he was in office from November 22, 1963 to January 20, 1969 and during his tenure, he signed the bill which has enabled black Americans to vote without discrimination. By the time he passed on, this great man had left behind a legacy that ensured he would live on in the hearts of all self respecting Americans. He served a long time in both houses of the congress. He was well versed in public speaking having taught public speaking, Johnson was obviously well prepared for the task ahead. After graduation, he was elected Congressman Richard M. Kleberg's legislative secretary and thus began his political career and worked his way up congress. He was known to be a workaholic who demanded the same from his subordinates. When he became the majority leader of congress in 1954's re-election, he was responsible for the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1957 thus considered by historians like Dallek as the most effective Senate majority leader in America's history. He had a way of getting to people. He appealed to their emotions in a way that only he could, He was notorious for discovering senators' philosophies in life, their prejudices, strengths and weakness and inevitably winning them over to his perspective. He had been appointed by Kennedy as head of the President's Committee on Equal Employment Opportunities where he worked with most minority groups in the US with his speech at Gettysburg catalyzing the activists. In collaboration with the civil Rights movement, Johnson overcame the resistance and got through to congress and eventually passed the Civil rights Act of 1964 that outlawed all forms of prejudice based on race. He appeals to a number of values; dignity, human rights, patriotism, democracy. Johnson's speech had to be well formulated if he was going to achieve his goal. He was facing a tough crowd with an even tougher topic that is of racism which was an accepted behavior at the time. In this scenario he had to choose carefully his diction and thus exemplified the situation by generalizing it. He was out to fight for the rights of all the minority groups in the country. He appealed to their patriotism by saying, 'There is no Negro problem, and there is no southern problem. There is no problem. There is only an American problem and we have met here tonight as Americans not as democrats or republicans, we arehere to solve this problem. He pressed on it further by adding that as a country they should look at the oppression of one particular group of people by another. He appealed to their basic human nature by saying 'This dignity cannot be found in a man's possessions, it cannot be found in his power, or in his position. It really rests in his right to be treated as a man, equal in opportunity to all others. It says that he shall share in freedom, he shall choose his leaders, he shall provide for his family according to his ability and his merits as a human being. These are things that every man wants to be able to do with no one hindering him/her from performing them. Johnson saw no reason for man to be denied his human rights based on the color of his skin, the most basic right of all being to choose leaders. Every American citizen must have an equal right to vote. There being no reason which can excuse the denial of that right. He went on to appeal to them for the sake of democracy by adding that 'the constitution says that no person shall be kept from voting because of his race or his color. He urged them to open their polling places to all p eople. Allow men and women to register and vote whatever the color of their skin. They are all citizens of this country and this is what it means to have democracy. In conclusion, Although the 15th amendment had clearly assured the right to vote for all citizens of the united states of America, African Americans were however not allowed to exercise that right and It was common place for a black American to be given a literacy test and pay poll taxes so as to be granted the right but even with that, only about 20% of black Americans were able to vote due to this sort of discrimination. In his speech, Johnson says this about the situation 'To apply any other test-to deny a man his hopes because of his color or race, his religion or the place of his birth-is not only to do injustice, it is to deny America and to dishonor the dead who gave their lives for freedom.' He went on further to say, 'All of us have to overcome the crippling legacy of bigotry and injustice.' In his speech, Johnson condemned the injustice that was meted out to people based on their color and appealed to the congress through his public speaking skills to reconsider the situation as it is and as how it should be. References: Caro, R. A. (1982). The Years of Lyndon Johnson: The Path to Power. New York: Alfred a Knopf Inc Reedy, G. (1982). Lyndon B Johnson: A Memoir. Woods: Randall

Sample Secondary Application Essay

Sample Secondary Application EssayMany candidates find that they have to do more than a sample secondary application essay to get accepted for medical school. This is because there are many special requirements for the admission process. Medical schools want to put you through a rigorous admissions process. If you can write well and get accepted, you will have made a great impression on those who review your application.A sample application essay that gives some basic information about you is what many candidates are required to write. Some of this information might be related to your personal life, or you might be interested in a particular career path that will match your interests. Here are some of the most common questions that you might be asked during the application process.There are multiple questionnaires to help you sort through your applications and should you get several, it is wise to read through them all and answer each one. The following essay sample might not be comp letely relevant for every situation, but it will give you an idea of what you might be asked. Some of the questions that you will need to answer are as follows: What is your professional experience? Describe a time in your life when you did something important.If you have worked for your employer, describe the tasks that were required of you and what was expected of you. You may also include a line that says: 'Please remember that this is my story, and it is a good story for a doctor'What do you like to do with your free time and why? Some of the questions that you will be asked will include: Describe a time in your life when you had to work very hard to help someone else.Tell about an activity that made you feel proud of your abilities and what you expected to achieve by doing it. After you have answered the above questions, you should answer these questions: Describe a time when you were afraid of meeting someone new or different.To do a sample secondary application essay, you sho uld be aware that you will be asked to fill out several different documents. The following document template might be helpful:

the Gracchus Brothers essays

the Gracchus Brothers essays With his brother, Gaius Gracchus (153-121 BC), Tiberius Gracchus, (163-133 BC), was brought up under special care of his mother, Cornelia, daughter of Scipio Africanus the Elder. In 146 BC he took part in the capture and destruction of Carthage, on which occasion he is said to have been the first Roman to scale the city wall. In 137 BC he acted as financial administrator to the army of Gaius Hostilius Mancinus in Spain. There in the ancient Spanish city of Numantia Tiberius saved from destruction an army of 20,000 Romans, which had been defeated. They were at the mercy of the Numantines who would only negotiate with Tiberius because they trusted his father. Upon his return to Rome Tiberius became a champion of the cause of the common people and the impoverished farmers. He was elected tribune of the people in133 BC, and despite opposition from the aristocracy led by his cousin, Scipio Africanus the Younger, he obtained legislation providing more equal distribution of public lands am ong the small farmers. A committee of three, consisting of Tiberius, his brother Gaius, and his father-in-law Appius Claudius Pulcher, was appointed to carry out the new law. When the term of his tribuneship expired, Tiberius presented himself for re-election. With this declaration he had upset the Senate, which thought that holding the office of tribune for two successive years was unlawful. A rumour followed that he was seeking dictatorial power. His enemies demanded his immediate death and formed a riot in which Tiberius was murdered, along with his 300 followers, and his body thrown into the Tiber River. At the time of hi brothers death, Gaius was serving with the Roman army in Spain. He returned to Rome a year or two later and attained a position in financial administration in 126 BC he was sent to Sardinia, then in a state of rebellion. Even though the Roman Senate wanted to keep Gaius from Rome by extending his term as financial administrat...

Is Turkish law incompatible with EU membership Essay

Is Turkish law incompatible with EU membership - Essay Example Ten years ago Turkey applied for accession to the European Union.Till today the accession has not be granted.Mainly because of the huge overall concern that Turkey is not what is perceived to be a truly democratic and free countryOne largely ignores the fact that not half a century ago that what was mostly a divided and warring section of Mediterranean countries like Greece, Spain and Portugal is now today an integrated and peaceful Europe and the European integration project in which Turkey wants to join, has brought Europe together into a cohesive whole creating a 'security community' within an ever growing community where there is a "democratic peace". Former authoritarian and militarily dominated countries have come together. And the conditionality for the membership 'peace and cooperation' has been the most potent tool for the drawing together of diverse cultures and groups such as French, German, Poles, Hungarian and Romanian countries. Dialogue and a mutual sense of security e xists where earlier there was only confrontation and suspicion. Till today Turkey's dream of integration into the EU is still a dream. A virulent debate still rages over whether Turkey will strengthen EU's 'democratic zone' or destroy it and undermine the functioning of the EU through its action, most of which is considered as unlawful in the EU.The most prominent argument is that Turkey is a hardliner and the regions surrounding Turkey is filled with instability, violence, terrorism and political instability with hard-line Islamic fundamentalism. But internationally prominent figures like George Bush and Condoleeza Rice, Tony Blair are all for the process of Turkey's integration into the European Union. Olli Rehn (assumed office as EU Commissioner for Enlargement on 22 November 2004,) is the President of the European Commission responsible for Enlargement of the European Union (ENP), which was adopted in 2003. EU borders are being stretched now to the Middle East and World borders are breaking down. Increasingly Turkey is starting to play a prominent role. It is shedding the coercive aspects of its political views and laws are becoming much more liberal and dependent on dialogue and cooperation, dismantling prejudices and promoting mutual trust. The Portuguese Foreign Affairs minister recognized this and after the Brussels Council meeting in 2005 he said 'the US will be pleased and Bin Laden will be disappointed'. This was the meeting where it was decided that talks on Turkey accession to the EU would start. With this accession to the EU it's credibility and influence in world politics and the Muslim world will increase significantly. Prominently opposition was because the Turks did not allow freedom of expression. For a long time challenging status quo in Cyprus amounted to treason and the Anan Plan was criticized and applauded in turn. The Prime Minister, Tayyip Erdoan (wanted a "win-win" solution) Discourse of this kind was a new phenomena and a novel one in Turkey and undoubted this was the pressure that was created due to the EU and the prospect of accession. On 12th September 2005 was published the 12 cartoons by the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten which showed the Muslim Prophet Muhammad in a variety of humorous or satirical situations. Turkey and the Muslim world clashed with the western world. Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen's nomination as NATO's new secretary-general due to his stand in 2005 in this issue lead to his leadership being strongly opposed and the rights and the freedom of expression in the Muslim world being strongly questioned. It seemed to be incompatible with the U.N declaration of human rights. Muslims complained about an 'ongoing smear campaign' in Denmark against Islam and warned that negative reaction could result in Muslim countries and Muslim communities in Europe. They called on the prime minister "to take all those responsible to task under law